1. Kramer A., et al. Consensus on Wound Antisepsis: Update 2018.  Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2018;31(1):28-58.(doi: 10.1159/000481545)
  2. Palumbo FP., et al. New Surfactant-based Dressing Product to Improve Wound Closure Rates of Nonhealing Wounds: A European Multicenter Study Including 1036 Patients. Wounds. 2016 Jul;28(7):233-40.
  3. Edlich RF., et al. The molecular basis for toxicity of surfactants in surgical wounds. 1. EO:PO block polymers. J Surg Res. 1973 Apr;14(4):277-84
  4. Du L., et al. A multifunctional in situ-forming hydrogel for wound healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2012;20(6):904-910.
  5. Zölß C, Cech JD. Efficacy of a new multifunctional surfactant-based biomaterial dressing with 1% silver sulphadiazine in chronic wounds. Int Wound J. 2016 Oct;13(5):738-43.
  6. Fabry W., et al. Activity of the antiseptic polyhexanide against meticillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2013; 1: 195–199.
  7. Dissemond J., et al. pH-Wert des Milieus chronischer Wunden. Hautarzt 2003; 54: 959–965.
  8. Fabry WH., et al. Activity of the antiseptic polyhexanide against Gram negative bacteria. Microb Drug Resist 2014;20: 138–143.
  9. Koburger T., et al.  Microbicidal activity of polihexanide. GMS Krankenhaushyg Interdiszip 2007; 2: Doc44.
  10. Werthen M., et al. Pseudomonas aeruginosa -induced infection and degradation of human wound fluid and skin proteins ex vivo are eradicated by a synthetic cationic polymer. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54: 772–779.
  11. Daeschlein G., et al. Feasibility and clinical applicability of polihexanide for treatment of second-degree burn wounds. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2007: 20(6): 292–6
  12. Mueller SW, Krebsbach LE. Impact of an antimicrobial-impregnated gauze dressing on surgical site infections including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Am J Infect Control 2008: 36(9): 651–5 ( doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2007.12.005 )
  13. Wiegand C., et al.  HaCaT keratinocytes in co-culture with Staphylococcus aureus can be protected from bacterial damage by polihexanide. Wound Repair Regen  2009;17(5):730-8.(doi: 10.1111/j.1524-475X.2009.00536.x.)
  14. Seipp HM., et al. Wirksamkeit verschiedener Wundspüllösungen gegenüber Biofilmen. J Wound Healing (ZfW) 2005:  4: 160–4
  15. Pietsch T, Kraft R. Antimikrobielle Wirksamkeit ausgewählter Substanzen für die Wasserdesinfektion in Dentaleinheiten mit Biofilmen. Aseptica 2006: 12(4): 3–4
  16. Harbs N, Siebert J. In vitro efficacy of octenidine and polihexanide against biofilms composed of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. GMS Krankenhaushyg Interdiszpl2007:  2(2): Doc.45 (20071228)
  17. Hubner NO., et al.  Efficacy of chlorhexidine, polihexanide and tissue- tolerable plasma against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms grown on polystyrene and silicone materials. Skin Pharmacol Physiol 2010; 34; 23(suppl 1):28–34.
  18. Perez R., et al.  Wirkung verschiedener Wundspullosungen auf MRSABiofilme in Wunden im Tiermodell (Schwein). WundManagement 2010; 4: 44–48.